Gene Veith links to an interesting Washington Post story about language written in our DNA. Veith points out with interest how the scientists interviewed in the piece use terms like “translation,” “read,” “instruction,” “message” and references to genetic punctuation marks. That language implies a Speaker, i.e., a Creator. Of course, don’t tell the Washington Post or the scientists that.
What’s more, the story constantly refers to evolution as having done these things, as if a random process had some sort of decision-making or goal-seeking capacity. You can take out the word “evolution” and insert “God” with very little confusion or disruption. Indeed, that is what evolution is “designed” (by its creators-note the small”c”) to do. It is simply a substitute for God and just as faith-based.
November 13, 2007 at 8:57 pm
I find this to be very fascinating, and yet I feel perplexed. It’s as if these scientists are consciously and with obstinance and purpose denying God. Almost as if there was something indwelling within them that is at war with God, something like an “old Adam” maybe?
February 10, 2009 at 2:56 am
Random is chaos pure and simple, there is no design what so ever to randomness. Opposite of random is design. And without random natural selection this planet earth would be dull and boring and probably wouldn’t survive for very long. While else has this planet earth of ours endured for so long and she’s not even middle aged yet.?