Movie-buff and political junkie that I am, I am always looking for the underlying political or social commentary in the movies I see. This is usually maddening to my wife or anyone else I go to the movies with as I become irritated and moody by the subtext of the movie plot, instead of the actual plot. Now that I am watching movies with my kids it is even worse. The modernist and post-modernist drivel that gets thrown their way in current “children’s movies” is often infuriating.
But I am intrigued by the off-beat and non-conformist (at least to Hollywood ideology) themes of two recent comedies (both decidedly not children’s movies). One is in current release and is receiving some critical acclaim: Juno. The other was a sort of gross out comedy hit from last Summer: Knocked Up.
Both are comedies about a girl or young woman who gets pregnant out-of-wedlock. They are certainly not family-friendly and both depict different aspects of the cesspool our culture has become. Whether it is Knocked Up’s man-child “community” in which Seth Rogen thrives with his buddies playing video games, smoking pot, and repeating or the sickening parent-free high school culture Juno’s protagonist inhabits, both movies reveal a world that is funny (to me, at least) and quite repulsive. But, that’s just it. Neither movie is trying to depict this world as fun or cool. Neither is a place you would want to be or participate in. That fact alone is enough to distinguish these comedies from countless sex comedies in movies (think the American Pie movies) and on TV (Friends). But, that’s not all.
Surprisingly, both movies have strong pro-life themes. I am not saying this simply because both of the female characters choose life. That is the usual abortion cop-out that Hollywood gives us. The female character anguishes over her decision to keep or kill her child. Ultimately, she decides to keep her child but only after her right to kill it (i.e., her choice) has been affirmed in a meaningful way that is not threatening or judgmental to women who have decided to kill their babies.
Both Knocked Up and Juno take a moral view on the question. The characters do not choose life because they have thought about it and decided that it is the right thing to do for them in this particular case. Instead, it is simply the right thing to do. It is a moral choice that has consequences.
In Knocked Up, as one of Seth Rogen’s man-child buddies tells him that what his girlfriend needs starts with an “A” and rhymes with “smortion,” another buddy is shocked. He declares that he would be killing an unborn child. Needless to say, we rarely hear abortion described as such by anyone in a movie who is not a religious fanatic. The female lead, a young professional woman played by Kathryn Heigl, tells her mother about her unplanned pregnancy and that she wants to keep her baby. Her mother is less than supportive. She urges her to instead “take care of it” and “have a real baby later.” Coming from the unborn child’s grandmother, this statement is chilling and it is meant to be.
In Juno, the lead character, a sixteen-year-old, has scheduled her appointment with the local abortion clinic, having given little to no thought to her “choice.” Before she walks in, she meets a lone protester that she knows from school (again, not a religious fanatic but a peer that she knows). The protester tells her that her baby wants to live and actually has fingernails. This seeming trivial fact starts haunting Juno as she sits in the clinic waiting room. Instead of a clean and comforting bastion of freedom and the rights of women, the clinic has the personality and feel of a post office. Juno receives the type of respect and concern usually reserved for cattle in a slaughter house. As she watches everyone in the clinic waiting room tap, chew, or paint their fingernails, she comes to an epiphany about what she is about to do. She flees the clinic and is determined to have the baby.
Both movies highlight ultrasound images of the babies as they are carried to term. In Knocked Up, the couple will have a go at being married and raising their baby. In Juno, the pregnant teenager has found a suitable set of parents to adopt her baby. Juno has probably made the wiser decision, but it is a more reality-based movie than the pure comedy of Knocked Up.
I doubt that either movie was made by a pro-lifer intent on making a political statement. The themes in both movies are way too subtle for that. Nevertheless, they both offer a peak into what might be changing views on abortion in the culture at large. Recent polling data suggests that young people are more pro-life than their parents even if they are less conservative or traditional about other things (homosexual relationships for example).
Whatever it means, it is refreshing to see abortion dealt with in this way. The facts are on our side. Science is on our side. The excuses and rationalizations for why babies should not be protected outside and inside the womb are rapidly dwindling. Any help is welcome, even if it comes in the form of Knocked Up and Juno.
January 7, 2008 at 9:21 pm
Well said. We’ll take our help where ever we can get it.
January 17, 2008 at 3:37 pm
[...] many abortions as they were, that would be something to cheer. I cannot help but think about my post last week about the movies Knocked Up and Juno. Of course, they came out after this study was [...]
February 8, 2008 at 8:02 pm
The issue that I found offensive (as a pro-natal/pro-choice sort of girl) is that Juno doesn’t renege on her agreement and keep her baby–she’s smart enough to beat the odds against teen mothers; the script makes that quite clear. But when you support “life,” I wonder, do you support (a) higher taxes to pay for universal health care, child care? (b) preferential hiring for mothers? In short, do you REALLY CARE ABOUT FAMIILES? Or are you just against abortion because you fear women and want to keep them barefoot & pregnant? That’s not a real love for children; that’s just mysogyny masquerading as principle.
February 8, 2008 at 10:08 pm
Wow! Bitter much? Have you tried dating men? It might change your attitude.
February 9, 2008 at 12:28 am
Alright, let’s all calm down. There’s no need for everyone to take cheap shots at each other (Mater Aetheria/OB1-K I’m talking to both of you).
Now:
mater aetheria: Thank you for posting on our blog with your thoughts, and though I disagree with what you’re saying, I’m always happy to see some other comments pouring in. With that said, it’s hard to give you a good response because your comments are more centered on “attacking” than true “dialogue”. But to answer your “A” question, there are issues that are far more important than higher taxes. “Pro-life” I believe is one of the issues that trumps taxes anyday. So to answer your question, if stopping Roe V. Wade means higher taxes, then so be it. If stopping Roe V. Wade doesn’t raise taxes, then so be it. If overturning R V. W brings about higher taxes I really could care less, we already are taxed for frivolous reasons, why not finally be taxed for something that is good and ethical?
To answer your “B” question, I can’t. I don’t know what you’re talking about with “preferential hiring for mothers”. Perhaps you could clarify?
As to your other comments, I find them pithy, silly, and above all empty of any essential arguments; they’re what I call “emotional outbursts”, so I’m not going to answer them. Lastly, I think you’re “painting with too broad of strokes”, meaning you’re lumping all “pro-life” people into one category, and you can’t do that.
August 21, 2008 at 6:04 pm
Both female protagonists should have had abortions. Plain and simple.
Teenage girls should be worried about passing geometry, not about having labor pains.
As for “Knocked Up,” it speaks volumes of how Hollywood is becoming increasingly out of touch when a woman who has everything going for her wouldn’t have abortion after a one-night stand with a man who has nothing going for him.
Pathetic and unethical, both movies are teaching women the wrong lessons in life.
Plan your child, ladies!
August 31, 2008 at 10:54 pm
This is a really good analysis. thanks!
I liked the “pro-life” elements of both those movies. I thought particularly Juno made a very strong pro-life statement when Juno decided to run out of the clinic and realized that she couldn’t have an abortion. I thought, for the most part, they were pro-life without being preachy which made it all the more tolerable.
I did find that Juno was a bit unrealistic though in its depiction of adoption. In “Juno” it was treated as if it was no big deal when in reality it really is. The kind of closed adoption that “Juno” opted for would actually be troubling to most birth mothers and most would eventually want to know where their biological children where (at least their whereabouts). The thing is that “Juno” is only 16 and may not be thinking full-spectrum. Who’s to say how she would feel about giving her child for adoption 10 years down the road?
I agree that it is a far better choice to put your child up for adoption rather than have an abortion, but I think an open adoption would have been far more realistic and easy to deal with in years to come.
January 26, 2009 at 11:17 am
Knocked Up was a much lower-quality film than Juno, I felt. It was much more formulaic and and unrealistic, at least, and much less enjoyable. There’s something offputting about the propaganda-esque quality of these movies where babies–or even love interests–transform the main characters from who they were. For one thing, I resent the automatic maligning of people who don’t have childrearing responsibilities (like many movies of this ilk.) Whether it’s a comfortable upper middle class BMW/rooftop apartment kinda guy, or jet-setting L.A.-based travel writer, Hollywood cannot allow these people to enjoy life until they have procreated. It is so boring. And, in the case of Knocked Up, if you’re an unemployed, pot smoking one-of-the-lads type, how is it a BAD thing that you are not responsible for the wellbeing of other people, particularly children?
Further, “Knocked Up,” “Nine Months,” etc. who indulge in this sort of (usually male) redeption belie the complexity of change and perpetuate the illusion that permanence can be created just like that and it’s reasonable to expect people to be that adaptable. Romance abetted by the untimely birth of children? Borderline mythological.
Anyway, the “unrealism” in Juno was pulled off by the protagonist’s naivete and adolescence. I mean, the rationale of the movie is the rationale of a teenager coping with her life, not the underlying message of the film. What was that message? Somewhat open to interpretation, I think. I don’t think that Juno necessarily makes the right choice, and her parents, or her boyfriend, or even the script writers, actors, etc., also seem a little ambivalent. But they support her. The movie is about how this particular girl manuevers through this situation. It doesn’t try to make a point about her being “a better person in the end.” (Juno would never say something that banal.) It shows, rather than tells, the lessons she learns, and if you pay attention you’ll see that they really aren’t about the virtue of not terminating a pregnancy. Juno learns that things are a lot more complicated than she thought–like marriages, other relationships, how things are going to be after going through this pregnancy experience, how other people feel about this baby, how what she’s doing is a really big deal–that through her assent a thoughtless experiment with a boy turns into an experience that nearly overpowered her–she’s a lot less cocky at the end of the film. I think to really appreciate this movie you have to realize that it’s really about one character, Juno. Juno is DEFinitely not anti-abortion. If anything I would say it questions the flippancy with which “pro-life” groups to suggest that adotion is a much better option for women and girls who are involuntarily pregnant. Especially from the angle of emotional hardship.
August 7, 2009 at 9:55 am
Thank you.
I’ve always wondered about how Hollywood will be able to ultimately brain wash the mass into accepting abortion.
I mean, it is against every motherly instinct to kill their own babies. Motherly instinct is so strong.
But of course Hollywood has done these kind of things before. And the formula is always the same.
Good to be reminded that everything on TV has agenda.